The first cable, sent by ABCB chairman Allen Robertson on 18 January, was 78 words long. It read in part: 'Bodyline bowling has assumed such proportions as to menace the best interests of the game, making protection of the body by the batsmen the main consideration. This is causing intensely bitter feeling between the players as well as injury. In our opinion it is unsportsmanlike. Unless stopped at once it is likely to upset the friendly relations existing between Australia and England.'
The MCC reply on 23 January was sterner still. The word 'unsportsmanlike,' applied to amateurs from Lord's, was unacceptable. 'We deplore your cable. We deprecate your opinion that there has been unsportsmanlike play... if it is such as to jeopardize the good relations between English and Australian cricketers and you consider it desirable to cancel the remainder of the programme we would consent, but with great reluctance.' In effect: withdraw the word, or the tour is over.
The Australian government reacted with alarm. The 1932-33 tour was a substantial economic event for Australia in the Depression; cancellation would cost gate receipts and goodwill. PM Joseph Lyons intervened privately, telling the Board it had to find a form of words that took back 'unsportsmanlike' without conceding that Bodyline was acceptable. After several rounds of cables — six in total over a fortnight — the Board substituted milder language and the fourth Test in Brisbane went ahead.
England won the series 4-1. The diplomatic damage outlasted the cricket: Pelham Warner came home a broken figure, Jardine's reputation in Australia never recovered, and the MCC's promise to legislate against 'direct attack' bowling — finally enacted in 1935 — was a direct concession to the cabled protest.