Umpire Kumar Dharmasena awarded six runs on an overthrow that deflected off Ben Stokes' bat, when the correct call should have been five. The decision may have changed the outcome of the World Cup final.
The 2019 Cricket World Cup was hosted by England and Wales, and it was a tournament England had spent four years preparing to win. After a humiliating first-round exit at the 2015 World Cup, England had completely overhauled their white-ball cricket under captain Eoin Morgan, coach Trevor Bayliss, and selector Ed Smith. They had become the number-one ranked ODI team in the world, playing an aggressive, boundary-heavy brand of cricket.
New Zealand, by contrast, were the quiet achievers. Led by Kane Williamson — widely regarded as one of the classiest batsmen and most respected captains in world cricket — the Black Caps had reached the final through grit, skill, and remarkable consistency. They had lost to England in the group stage but had navigated a tricky path through the knockout rounds.
The final was played at Lord's, the "Home of Cricket," adding a layer of historical significance. For England, it was a chance to win their first-ever 50-over World Cup on home soil. For New Zealand, it was an opportunity to avenge their 2015 final defeat to Australia. The match was sold out weeks in advance, and millions around the world tuned in to watch what would become one of the most extraordinary sporting events ever witnessed.
New Zealand batted first and posted a modest but competitive 241/8 in their 50 overs. Henry Nicholls top-scored with 55, but New Zealand's innings never quite kicked on against a disciplined England bowling attack. On a used Lord's pitch offering some assistance to the bowlers, 241 was seen as below par but potentially defendable.
England's chase started disastrously. They were 86/4 and in serious trouble when Stokes and Buttler rebuilt. Buttler fell for 59, and England collapsed again to 203/8 and then 227/9. Stokes was running out of partners. When Mark Wood was dismissed, last man Adil Rashid joined Stokes with England needing 15 off 10 balls. The tension at Lord's was almost unbearable — 28,000 spectators watched in near-silence between balls, then erupted with every run scored.
The 2019 Cricket World Cup Final at Lord's on July 14, 2019, is widely regarded as the greatest cricket match ever played. England versus New Zealand, played over a full day and into the evening, produced a sequence of events so dramatic that even the most creative screenwriter would have dismissed the script as implausible. And at its very heart was an umpiring decision that may have decided the fate of the World Cup.
With England needing 9 runs off 3 balls to win, Ben Stokes — already playing the innings of his life — heaved Trent Boult's delivery towards the deep midwicket boundary. The ball didn't reach the rope, and Martin Guptill fielded it cleanly. Stokes and Adil Rashid ran two, but as Stokes dived to make his ground for the second run, Guptill's throw from the deep hit Stokes' outstretched bat and deflected away to the boundary.
Umpire Kumar Dharmasena signalled six runs — the two already run plus four for the overthrow boundary. The Lord's crowd erupted. But in the chaos of the moment, a critical error had been made. Law 19.8 of the Laws of Cricket states that when an overthrow reaches the boundary, the runs scored should be the number of runs completed by the batsmen at the moment the fielder releases the ball, plus the boundary four. Video analysis later showed that Stokes and Rashid had not yet crossed for their second run when Guptill released the throw. Therefore, the correct award should have been five runs (one completed run plus four for the boundary), not six.
That single run would prove to be the difference between England winning and the match continuing. England's innings finished on 241 — exactly tying New Zealand's total. Had the correct five runs been awarded, England would have finished on 240 and New Zealand would have won the World Cup outright. Instead, the match went to a Super Over.
The Super Over itself was barely less dramatic. Stokes and Jos Buttler scored 15 for England. New Zealand's Jimmy Neesham and Guptill then scored 15 as well — another tie. Under the tournament's rules, the World Cup would be decided by boundary count. England had hit 26 boundaries to New Zealand's 17. England were World Cup champions.
The New Zealand team stood in stunned disbelief. Kane Williamson, their captain, maintained extraordinary composure but the pain was visible. His team had not lost the World Cup — they had been denied it by an umpiring error and a tiebreaker rule that had nothing to do with the skill or quality of their cricket. The boundary count rule was widely seen as arbitrary and unjust, a mechanism designed for administrative convenience rather than sporting merit.
Dharmasena's error did not become widely understood until the days following the final, when frame-by-frame analysis confirmed the batsmen had not crossed. In a 2020 interview, Dharmasena admitted he "could have made a mistake" and acknowledged that the pressure of the moment made it impossible to process the complex Law in real time. He pointed out that there was no mechanism to review the overthrow decision — it was not within the scope of DRS.
The cricketing world was divided. Many felt England were deserving champions given their four-year transformation into a white-ball powerhouse. Others argued that New Zealand had been robbed twice — once by the overthrow error and once by the boundary count rule. The neutrals simply mourned the fact that the greatest cricket match ever played had been decided by technicalities rather than cricket.
Ben Stokes hits towards deep midwicket and runs two with Adil Rashid
Martin Guptill's throw from the deep hits Stokes' bat as he dives for his crease
The ball deflects off Stokes' bat and races to the boundary
Umpire Kumar Dharmasena awards six runs instead of the correct five
England tie the match at 241 — the scores are level after 50 overs each
The Super Over also ends in a tie at 15 runs each
England win the World Cup on boundary count (26 to 17) — the most controversial tiebreaker in cricket history
“I had a gut feeling it was six runs. In that pressure situation, I went with my instinct. I could have made a mistake.”
“It's a bit of a shame, isn't it? But that's the way it goes. We're not going to blame anyone.”
“I apologised to Kane after the game. It wasn't how I wanted to win a World Cup, but we'll take it.”
“That has to be the most dramatic, ridiculous, unbelievable game of cricket ever played.”
The aftermath was a mixture of euphoria for England and devastation for New Zealand. The England team celebrated wildly at Lord's, with the image of Stokes lying flat on the pitch, arms outstretched, becoming one of cricket's most iconic photographs. But even in celebration, there was an awareness that the victory was tainted by controversy.
New Zealand's response was a masterclass in grace. Kane Williamson accepted the result with remarkable dignity, refusing to blame the umpires or the rules. His post-match press conference, where he described the outcome as "a bit of a shame" with characteristic understatement, won him even more admirers worldwide. The contrast between the magnitude of the injustice and Williamson's composure was striking.
The ICC faced fierce criticism for both the overthrow error and the boundary count rule. Within months, the ICC announced that the boundary count tiebreaker would be replaced by additional Super Overs in all future ICC knockout matches. The overthrow law was also scrutinized, with calls for it to be reviewable by the third umpire, though no formal change has been implemented.
Dharmasena later admitted the error in awarding six runs instead of five. The ICC subsequently removed the boundary count rule for future ICC knockouts, replacing it with repeated Super Overs. New Zealand were denied the World Cup by what many consider the most consequential umpiring error in cricket history.
The 2019 World Cup Final overthrow incident is arguably the single most consequential umpiring decision in cricket history. Unlike other controversial decisions that affected individual matches, this one may have determined the winner of a World Cup — cricket's most prestigious prize.
The removal of the boundary count rule was the most immediate legacy. Future ICC tournaments would use repeated Super Overs instead, ensuring that the winner was determined by actual cricket rather than a statistical tiebreaker. The 2019 final exposed the absurdity of deciding a World Cup on a metric that bore no relation to the contest itself.
The incident also reignited the debate about expanding the scope of DRS. Currently, overthrow decisions and certain procedural matters cannot be reviewed by the third umpire. The 2019 final demonstrated that these "unreviewed" decisions can have consequences just as significant as any LBW or caught-behind appeal. The question of whether all on-field decisions should be reviewable remains one of cricket's unresolved governance issues.
Gujarat Titans vs Rajasthan Royals
29 May 2026
The Qualifier 2 toss between Gujarat Titans and Rajasthan Royals at Mullanpur had to be conducted twice after match referee Prakash Bhatt failed to hear Riyan Parag's call — a visible frustration for Shubman Gill who appeared to have won the original toss before the do-over.
Lucknow Super Giants vs Kolkata Knight Riders
26 April 2026
Kartik Tyagi bowled two beamers in the final over of LSG's chase but was allowed to continue — umpires called only one dangerous — sparking IPL fury.
Various county and representative sides
1864-06-01
The legalisation of overarm bowling in 1864 created an immediate grey zone: how high could the arm go, and at what point did a fast delivery become an illegal throw? Through the 1860s English cricket struggled with this question as a succession of fast bowlers developed actions that umpires suspected but rarely no-balled, creating a climate of suspicion that would recur in every generation of cricket thereafter.