Player Clashes

Mike Gatting vs Shakoor Rana — Finger-Pointing Fury

8 December 1987Pakistan vs England2nd Test, Faisalabad5 min readSeverity: Explosive

Summary

England captain Mike Gatting and umpire Shakoor Rana had a furious finger-pointing row that caused an entire day's play to be lost.

Background

The 1987 England tour of Pakistan was already tense before the Faisalabad Test. The history between the two cricketing nations was fraught with suspicion and mistrust — England had long harboured grievances about the standard of umpiring in Pakistan, while Pakistani players and officials resented what they saw as English arrogance and double standards. The tour had been preceded by murmurings of discontent on both sides.

Mike Gatting was England's captain — a combative, proud man who wore his heart on his sleeve. He had fought his way to the England captaincy and commanded fierce loyalty from his players. He was not a diplomat by nature, and the stifling heat and pressure of Test cricket in Pakistan had stretched his patience. Shakoor Rana was an experienced Pakistani umpire with a reputation for being assertive and willing to confront players when he felt the need.

The Faisalabad Test was the 2nd Test of the series. England were in a decent position but needed to press their advantage. The game was tense, the conditions were difficult, and the atmosphere was combustible. All that was needed was a spark.

Build-Up

The flashpoint came during Pakistan's second innings. England were in the field, and Gatting was moving his fielders around as captains routinely do. He signalled a fielding change while the bowler — Eddie Hemmings — was in the process of starting his run-up. According to Shakoor Rana, this constituted cheating: altering the field positions without the batsman's knowledge while play was technically already in motion.

Shakoor Rana called time on play and confronted Gatting directly. He accused the England captain of cheating — of deliberately moving a fielder behind the batsman's back to create an unfair advantage. Gatting was incensed. He believed he had done nothing wrong and that Rana was overstepping his authority. He responded with words that were equally direct, calling Rana a cheat.

What might have been resolved with a quiet conversation became a public, career-defining confrontation. Both men refused to back down. The cameras captured everything. By the end of the day, the situation had escalated to the point where Shakoor Rana declared he would not continue umpiring unless Gatting issued a written apology.

What Happened

During the 2nd Test between Pakistan and England at Faisalabad in 1987, one of cricket's most famous confrontations occurred between England captain Mike Gatting and Pakistani umpire Shakoor Rana. The dispute began when Shakoor Rana accused Gatting of unfairly moving a fielder after the bowler had begun his run-up.

The ensuing argument was extraordinary in its intensity. Gatting and Shakoor Rana stood nose-to-nose, pointing fingers at each other and exchanging heated words. The image of the red-faced Gatting jabbing his finger at the umpire became one of cricket's most iconic photographs.

Shakoor Rana refused to continue umpiring unless Gatting apologised in writing. Gatting initially refused, and an entire day's play was lost as the standoff continued. Eventually, under pressure from the British government (which had diplomatic interests in Pakistan), Gatting was instructed to write a letter of apology. He did so reluctantly, reportedly ending the letter with "under protest." The players were each given a £1,000 hardship bonus by the TCCB (English cricket board) for having to endure the situation. The incident severely damaged England-Pakistan cricketing relations.

Key Moments

1

Gatting signals a fielding change while the bowler begins his run-up — Shakoor Rana calls it cheating

2

Gatting confronts Rana — the two men stand nose-to-nose in one of cricket's most iconic photographs

3

Heated exchange of words — Gatting calls Rana a cheat; Rana makes equally provocative accusations

4

Shakoor Rana refuses to stand at the next day's play unless Gatting writes a formal apology

5

An entire day of Test cricket is lost as the standoff continues — diplomatic pressure mounts

6

Gatting writes a grudging apology 'under protest' on instruction from the TCCB — play resumes

Timeline

8 December 1987

Gatting signals a fielding change mid-run-up — Shakoor Rana accuses him of cheating

Same afternoon

Confrontation erupts — famous finger-pointing photograph taken

End of day 2

Shakoor Rana declares he will not umpire again unless Gatting apologies in writing

9 December 1987

Entire day's play is lost as standoff continues — diplomatic pressure builds

10 December 1987

Gatting writes apology 'under protest' on TCCB instruction — play resumes

Post-tour

TCCB pay England players £1,000 hardship bonus; neutral umpire debate intensifies

Notable Quotes

I wrote the apology under protest and under instruction. I believed then and believe now that I had done nothing wrong.

Mike Gatting

He was trying to cheat. I saw it. As an umpire it was my duty to stop it. I will not apologise for doing my job.

Shakoor Rana

The image of Gatting and Shakoor Rana pointing fingers at each other is one of cricket's most recognised photographs. It captures everything that went wrong that day.

Peter Roebuck, cricket journalist

England lost a day of Test cricket because two proud men refused to back down. The diplomatic fallout lasted years.

Cricket historian

Aftermath

The standoff lasted beyond the end of play, consuming the following day entirely. The diplomatic consequences were significant — the British government had trade and political interests in Pakistan that meant it needed the tour to continue. Pressure was applied through official channels on the TCCB, which in turn applied pressure on Gatting to write the apology.

Gatting's letter was reportedly brief, grudging, and written under obvious duress. According to those who saw it, the phrase "under protest" was included or the tone made it abundantly clear that he was complying under compulsion rather than out of genuine remorse. The players on both sides were given a £1,000 "hardship payment" by the TCCB for having to endure the situation — a payment that itself generated controversy, as some felt it implicitly acknowledged that the England players had been placed in an untenable position.

The incident permanently affected Gatting's standing as England captain. While he retained the captaincy for some time after, the Faisalabad episode followed him. When he was eventually sacked following a newspaper story about a barmaid at a post-Test function, the Shakoor Rana incident was part of the accumulating narrative around his tenure.

⚖️ The Verdict

An entire day's play was lost. Gatting forced to apologise in writing. The incident damaged England-Pakistan cricket relations for years.

Legacy & Impact

The Gatting-Shakoor Rana confrontation became one of cricket's most discussed and dissected incidents because it crystallised so many of the sport's fundamental tensions: the authority of umpires versus the rights of players; the political dimension of international cricket; the question of who bears responsibility when two combative personalities collide; and the unequal power dynamics that existed between touring sides and home umpiring panels in the pre-neutral umpires era.

The incident was a significant driver of the subsequent push for neutral umpires in Test cricket — the principle that neither team should have an advantage from having umpires from the home nation standing. This reform, when it came, was one of cricket's most important governance changes. Shakoor Rana and Mike Gatting may have contributed more to cricket's modernisation through their confrontation than either of them intended.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Gatting do wrong according to Shakoor Rana?
Shakoor Rana accused Gatting of moving a fielder while the bowler was in the process of starting his run-up, without the batsman's knowledge. Rana considered this cheating — an unfair attempt to alter the field positions without the batsman being aware. Gatting maintained he had done nothing improper.
Why did Shakoor Rana refuse to umpire?
Shakoor Rana considered Gatting's conduct, and particularly his language and tone during the confrontation, to be an unacceptable insult to his authority as an umpire. He demanded a written, formal apology before he would stand at the crease again. He held firm for an entire day before Gatting complied.
Why was a whole day of play lost?
Gatting initially refused to issue the written apology that Shakoor Rana demanded. Without Rana's agreement to return to the field, play could not continue. The standoff lasted a full day while diplomatic and administrative pressure was applied to resolve it. It was one of the few times in Test history that a dispute between a captain and an umpire caused such a prolonged suspension of play.
Did the incident contribute to neutral umpires in Test cricket?
Yes. The Faisalabad incident was one of several events that highlighted the problem of home umpires potentially — consciously or unconsciously — favouring the home side. The push for neutral umpires gained significant momentum in the years following the incident, and neutral umpires eventually became standard practice in Test cricket.
What happened to Gatting's captaincy?
Gatting retained the captaincy for some time after Faisalabad but was sacked in 1988 after a newspaper story unrelated to cricket. The Shakoor Rana incident had already damaged his reputation and made him a more controversial figure. He later led a rebel tour to South Africa during the apartheid era, further complicating his legacy.

Related Incidents