Greatest Cricket Moments

The Roundarm Trial Matches — Sussex v England, Summer 1827

1827-07-25Sussex vs EnglandThree trial matches, Sussex v England, Sheffield/Lord's/Brighton, June-July 18273 min readSeverity: Serious

Summary

To resolve the running argument over roundarm bowling, the MCC sanctioned three matches in the summer of 1827 between Sussex — whose bowlers Lillywhite and Broadbridge would deliver roundarm — and an England XI bowling only underarm. Played at Sheffield (4-6 June), Lord's (18-19 June) and Brighton (23-25 July), the series was meant to test whether roundarm should be legalised. Sussex won the first two and lost the third, the trial was declared inconclusive, and the law was nudged a step further the following year.

Background

Roundarm had been creeping into the game since John Willes in the 1810s. Willes himself had walked out of Lord's in 1822. Lillywhite and Broadbridge of Sussex had taken up the cause and made it the basis of the strongest county side in England. The MCC could no longer pretend the issue would resolve itself.

Build-Up

Sussex were already being acclaimed as the champion county of the 1820s, on the strength of their two roundarm bowlers. The trial was as much a recognition of their dominance as a test of the new style. The MCC set the terms; the Sussex players had every incentive to demonstrate that their action was both legal in spirit and unanswerable in practice.

What Happened

By 1827 the gap between the law and the practice of bowling had become impossible to ignore. Sussex, with William Lillywhite and Jem Broadbridge as their twin spearhead, had been bowling roundarm against all comers and umpires were turning a blind eye. The MCC convened the trial under formal terms: Sussex would be allowed to bowl roundarm; the England XI would bowl only the legal underarm. The first match at Darnall New Ground in Sheffield from 4 to 6 June was won by Sussex by seven wickets, with Lillywhite taking five and two, and Broadbridge two and five. The second match at Lord's on 18-19 June was also won by Sussex. England's batsmen, including the leading professionals of the day, were demonstrably outclassed by the new style. After the second match, several England players signed a public letter declaring that they would refuse to play in the third unless the umpires enforced the existing law strictly against the Sussex bowlers. The third match, at Brighton's Royal New Ground from 23 to 25 July, saw the England XI rally — partly because some of their own bowlers tried roundarm in defiance of the official terms — and they won by 24 runs. The series was officially declared inconclusive. In practice, however, it had demonstrated two things: that roundarm was a more effective bowling style, and that the umpires would not enforce the old law. The MCC the following year amended Rule 10 to permit the hand to be raised to the elbow.

Key Moments

1

4-6 Jun 1827: First trial match at Darnall New Ground, Sheffield. Sussex win by 7 wickets

2

Lillywhite takes 5 and 2; Broadbridge takes 2 and 5

3

18-19 Jun 1827: Second trial match at Lord's. Sussex win again

4

England professionals sign public letter of protest after the second match

5

23-25 Jul 1827: Third match at the Royal New Ground, Brighton

6

England rally and win by 24 runs

7

Series declared inconclusive

8

1828: MCC amends Rule 10 to permit hand to elbow height

Timeline

4-6 Jun 1827

First trial at Darnall, Sheffield. Sussex win by 7 wickets

18-19 Jun 1827

Second trial at Lord's. Sussex win

23-25 Jul 1827

Third trial at Brighton. England win by 24 runs

Late 1827

MCC declares the trial inconclusive

1828

Rule 10 amended to permit hand to elbow height

Notable Quotes

Sussex were too good for England with the bowling of Lillywhite and Broadbridge, but the trial was officially declared inconclusive.

Arthur Haygarth, Scores and Biographies

Aftermath

After the trials, umpires effectively gave up trying to enforce the underarm law against Lillywhite and Broadbridge. Sussex remained the leading county of the late 1820s and 1830s. The MCC's 1828 amendment was a half-measure — the law still in theory forbade shoulder-height bowling — and the issue would not be settled until the 1835 amendment legalised roundarm outright.

⚖️ The Verdict

Officially inconclusive, practically decisive: the trial confirmed that roundarm was the future and forced MCC to begin the process of formally legalising it.

Legacy & Impact

The 1827 trials are one of the most important sequences in cricket law-making. They established the precedent that has governed every subsequent action controversy: when law and practice diverge, the law must yield. The Sheffield-Lord's-Brighton schedule also showcased the geographical breadth of organised cricket in the late 1820s — Sheffield in particular emerged as a major venue.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who organised the trials?
The MCC, in response to the open use of roundarm bowling by Sussex's Lillywhite and Broadbridge in defiance of the existing underarm law.
What were the terms?
Sussex bowlers were permitted to bowl roundarm; the England XI's bowlers had to confine themselves to underarm.
Did roundarm become legal as a result?
Not immediately. The trial was declared inconclusive, but in 1828 the MCC raised the legal hand height to the elbow, and in 1835 roundarm was formally enshrined in the Laws.

Related Incidents

Serious

Sutcliffe & Holmes — The 555 Opening Stand at Leyton, 1932

Yorkshire v Essex

1932-06-16

On 15-16 June 1932 Herbert Sutcliffe (313) and Percy Holmes (224*) put on 555 for the first wicket against Essex at Leyton, breaking the world first-class record for any wicket and adding a layer of folklore — including a scoreboard that read 554 for several minutes and a hastily reversed declaration — that has clung to the partnership ever since.

#county-championship#yorkshire#essex
Serious

Eddie Paynter Leaves Hospital Bed to Score 83 — Brisbane, 1933

Australia v England

1933-02-14

With the fate of the Bodyline series in the balance and England 216 for 6 chasing 340, Eddie Paynter checked himself out of a Brisbane hospital where he was being treated for acute tonsillitis, taxied to the Gabba in pyjamas and a dressing gown, and batted for nearly four hours to score 83. England drew level on first innings, won the Test by six wickets and the series 4-1.

#bodyline#ashes#1933
Explosive

Bradman's Near-Fatal Peritonitis — End of the 1934 Tour

Australia

1934-09-25

Days after the 1934 Oval Test, Bradman fell seriously ill with appendicitis that progressed to peritonitis. With antibiotics not yet available, he was given little chance of survival; his wife Jessie left Adelaide on a sea voyage to England prepared for the worst. He recovered after weeks of intensive nursing in a London nursing home and returned to first-class cricket the following Australian summer.

#don-bradman#1934#england