Faf du Plessis was caught on camera applying saliva to the ball while sucking a mint, which constitutes ball tampering. He was fined but not banned.
During the second Test between South Africa and Pakistan in Dubai, television cameras caught South African batsman Faf du Plessis applying saliva to the ball while he had a mint or sweet in his mouth. Applying artificial substances to the ball is considered ball tampering.
Match referee David Boon charged du Plessis with changing the condition of the ball. Du Plessis was found guilty and fined 50% of his match fee but received no ban. The lenient punishment was criticized by some who felt ball tampering should carry a suspension.
Du Plessis and the South African team were unapologetic, with du Plessis saying he didn't believe it constituted ball tampering. The incident raised questions about the grey areas in ball management — players regularly apply saliva to the ball, and the line between legitimate maintenance and tampering is not always clear.
This was not du Plessis' only brush with ball tampering allegations. He was later charged again in 2016 during a Test against Australia, when cameras appeared to show him applying the ball to the zipper of his trouser pocket. He was again fined but not banned.
Found guilty. Fined 50% of match fee. No ban. The lenient punishment sparked debate about consistency in ball-tampering sanctions.
Gujarat Titans vs Rajasthan Royals
29 May 2026
The Qualifier 2 toss between Gujarat Titans and Rajasthan Royals at Mullanpur had to be conducted twice after match referee Prakash Bhatt failed to hear Riyan Parag's call — a visible frustration for Shubman Gill who appeared to have won the original toss before the do-over.
Lucknow Super Giants vs Kolkata Knight Riders
26 April 2026
Kartik Tyagi bowled two beamers in the final over of LSG's chase but was allowed to continue — umpires called only one dangerous — sparking IPL fury.
Various county and representative sides
1864-06-01
The legalisation of overarm bowling in 1864 created an immediate grey zone: how high could the arm go, and at what point did a fast delivery become an illegal throw? Through the 1860s English cricket struggled with this question as a succession of fast bowlers developed actions that umpires suspected but rarely no-balled, creating a climate of suspicion that would recur in every generation of cricket thereafter.