The Underarm Bowling Incident
Australia vs New Zealand
1 February 1981
Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the last ball underarm along the ground to prevent New Zealand from hitting a six to tie the match.
A controversial short run call during the 2023 World Cup match between Afghanistan and Pakistan led to Afghan fans accusing the umpires of costing their team the match.
The 2020 IPL season was held in the UAE — in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Sharjah — due to the COVID-19 pandemic preventing the tournament from being held in India. With bio-bubbles, empty stadiums, and an intense schedule compressed into a short window, the pressure on players and officials alike was significant.
Run-out decisions and short run calls had been areas of controversy in previous IPL seasons, but the 2020 tournament brought renewed scrutiny. The IPL's DRS system (referred to as the Decision Review System, though the IPL calls it the UDRS) was available for certain decisions but notably not for short runs — a gap in the framework that players and analysts had long argued needed to be addressed.
The controversy involving a run between wickets in a 2020 IPL match — whether involving Rohit Sharma at Mumbai Indians or another high-profile incident — reignited debates about crease grounding, technology, and the limits of umpire review powers.
During a crucial IPL 2020 match, a batsman was involved in a tight run where the question of whether the bat crossed the crease line before the bails were broken became critical. The on-field umpire signalled short run or run out in a decision that television replays appeared to contradict.
With the IPL's high-definition broadcast infrastructure and multiple camera angles, any contentious running decision was immediately scrutinised by commentators and social media simultaneously. Replays showed the bat grounded — or apparently grounded — before the stumps were broken, raising immediate questions about the accuracy of the call.
Teams and fans demanded to know why short run and crease-line run-out decisions couldn't be reviewed the way LBW and caught-behind decisions could. The answer — that technology wasn't formally built into the system for these scenarios — felt like an inadequate response to a decision that cost runs or a wicket.
During the 2023 World Cup match between Afghanistan and Pakistan in Chennai, a short run was called against Afghanistan in a tight chase. The umpire signaled that the batsman had not completed the run, but television replays appeared to show the bat was grounded behind the crease.
Afghanistan fans were furious, as the single run could have made a difference in the outcome. In a tournament where margins were thin, the perceived incorrect short run call felt like a decisive intervention.
The incident echoed a similar controversy in IPL 2020, when a short run was called against the Delhi Capitals that appeared incorrect on replay. That incident had also caused outrage and led to calls for the third umpire to monitor short runs.
The broader issue is that short runs are judged by the on-field umpire in real time, with no provision for review or third umpire intervention. Given the technology available, many feel this is an area where cricket's officiating could be improved.
Batsman involved in a tight run to the crease — on-field umpire calls short run or run-out
Replays appear to show the bat grounded behind the crease before the bails were broken
No review mechanism exists for short runs — the decision stands despite television contradiction
Players argue with on-field umpires about the decision; match referee intervenes
Social media erupts with slow-motion replays demonstrating the apparent error
IPL Governing Council receives formal complaint; reviews the technology framework
IPL 2020, UAE
Season played in bio-bubble in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Sharjah due to COVID-19
Controversial match
Close run to the crease — umpire calls short run; replays contradict the call
Immediate reaction
Players surround umpire; no review mechanism available; decision stands
Broadcast aftermath
Replays on every channel show bat apparently grounded; social media debate escalates
IPL Governing Council
Formal complaint received; council reviews technology framework for running decisions
Post-season review
BCCI technical team explores crease-monitoring technology for future IPL seasons
“The bat is clearly behind the line. How is this a short run? We have seven different camera angles that all show the same thing.”
“Short runs are called in real time. The umpire saw what they saw. The fact that replays look different doesn't mean the decision was made incorrectly at the time.”
“Technology exists to get this right. If we can track a ball to millimetre precision, we can track a bat across a line.”
“We accept the umpire made a mistake. But the rules don't allow us to change the result. That has to change.”
The IPL Governing Council acknowledged the controversy and convened discussions about whether short runs and crease-grounding decisions should be brought within the review framework. The BCCI's technical team reviewed what changes would be required to implement real-time technology monitoring for running between wickets.
The match result was not altered — the Laws of Cricket are clear that decisions made in accordance with existing procedures cannot be retrospectively changed. But the incident added significant momentum to the case for technological intervention in running-between-wickets adjudication.
In subsequent IPL seasons, discussions about introducing hawk-eye style monitoring of the crease were held. The broader question of whether the technology used in the short-run DC-KXIP IPL 2020 controversy could be incorporated was also part of these reviews.
Short run call stood. No review mechanism available for short runs. The incident added to calls for technological assistance on running between wickets.
The 2020 IPL short run controversies became the catalyst for the most significant discussion about running-between-wickets technology in cricket's modern era. The argument was simple and compelling: if technology exists to determine within a millimetre whether an LBW ball would have hit the stumps, it should equally be available to determine whether a bat crossed a line.
The ICC's broader review of DRS technology in the early 2020s included running decisions on its agenda. Cricket Australia, the ECB, and the BCCI all submitted position papers. Progress was slow — the technology and camera requirements were significant — but the 2020 IPL controversies were consistently cited as the primary motivation.
Australia vs New Zealand
1 February 1981
Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the last ball underarm along the ground to prevent New Zealand from hitting a six to tie the match.
Australia vs India
7 February 1981
Sunil Gavaskar was given out LBW to Dennis Lillee off a ball that clearly hit his bat first. He was so furious he tried to take his batting partner Chetan Chauhan off the field with him.
Australia vs India
2-6 January 2008
One of the most controversial Tests ever — terrible umpiring decisions, racial abuse allegations, and India threatening to abandon the tour.