The Underarm Bowling Incident
Australia vs New Zealand
1 February 1981
Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the last ball underarm along the ground to prevent New Zealand from hitting a six to tie the match.
Sachin Tendulkar was given out caught behind in the high-stakes India-Pakistan World Cup match despite replays suggesting the ball brushed his pad, not bat.
The 1999 Cricket World Cup Super Six stage brought together the most dramatic India-Pakistan encounter in World Cup history up to that point. The match at Old Trafford, Manchester, on 8 June 1999 was played with the Kargil War raging between the two nations, elevating a cricket match to a geopolitical spectacle.
India, chasing qualification for the semi-finals, needed a win. Pakistan, led by Wasim Akram, had a formidable bowling attack. Sachin Tendulkar was India's talisman — if he failed, the nation's hopes dimmed. The pressure on every decision in that match was immense.
Umpire David Shepherd was one of cricket's most respected officials, known for his eccentric habit of hopping when the score reached Nelson (111 or multiples). But even respected umpires made mistakes in the pre-DRS era, and there was no technology to overturn a wrong call.
India batted first and set a competitive total. Pakistan then made a mess of the chase, and when India batted again in the Super Six match — this time as the side chasing — Sachin Tendulkar's wicket was the prize Pakistan desperately needed.
Wasim Akram, one of the greatest swing bowlers of all time, was the man hunting Tendulkar. The ball that dismissed Sachin moved late and the appeal was loud and immediate. Umpire Shepherd raised his finger without hesitation.
Replays shown on television immediately created doubt. The ball appeared to brush the pad, not the bat. But without DRS, without a review system, the decision was irreversible. Tendulkar had to walk, and India's heart sank.
In the most anticipated match of the 1999 World Cup at Old Trafford — India versus Pakistan — Sachin Tendulkar was batting magnificently on 45 when he was given caught behind off Shoaib Akhtar. The decision was made by umpire David Shepherd.
Replays showed the ball appeared to flick Tendulkar's pad rather than his bat, suggesting it was an incorrect decision. Given the enormity of the occasion — an India-Pakistan World Cup match — the decision was hugely significant.
Tendulkar's dismissal was a turning point. Though India still won the match thanks to Rahul Dravid's 61 and Venkatesh Prasad's bowling, the incident was debated endlessly in the subcontinent. It became another example cited by those who pushed for technology to assist umpires.
The match itself was played against the backdrop of the Kargil conflict between India and Pakistan, adding an extraordinary layer of tension to every decision on the field.
Wasim Akram bowls a late-swinging delivery to Tendulkar; loud caught-behind appeal goes up from wicketkeeper Moin Khan
Umpire David Shepherd raises his finger — Tendulkar given out caught behind for 45
TV replays immediately suggest the ball flicked the pad, not the bat edge — confusion and controversy erupts
India fans watching at home and in the stands are distraught; the Kargil conflict backdrop makes every decision feel like more than cricket
India recover through Rahul Dravid's 61 and win the match by 47 runs, but Sachin's dismissal dominates post-match discussion
The incident becomes a milestone case for why India later pushed hardest among all nations for the introduction of DRS
8 Jun 1999
India vs Pakistan Super Six match at Old Trafford begins; the Kargil conflict gives the contest extraordinary geopolitical weight
India innings
Tendulkar bats on 45 when Wasim Akram bowls him; loud caught-behind appeal upheld by umpire David Shepherd
TV replay
Broadcast replays immediately suggest the ball flicked Tendulkar's pad, not bat; India fans outraged
Innings continues
Rahul Dravid anchors India's innings with 61; India post a competitive total
Pakistan chase
Venkatesh Prasad dismisses Shoaib Akhtar for a duck; India bowl Pakistan out and win by 47 runs
Post-match
Tendulkar's dismissal dominates media coverage across India and Pakistan for weeks
“I didn't hit it. It was pad, not bat. But there was nothing I could do — I had to go.”
“David Shepherd was a great umpire. But no human can always get it right from that distance. That is why we needed DRS.”
“The Kargil war was in the background. Every decision felt like it had the weight of a nation behind it.”
“Even if Sachin was wrongly given out, India found a way to win. That tells you the character of that team.”
Despite the controversial dismissal, India recovered to win the match by 47 runs — a victory driven by Rahul Dravid's composed batting and Venkatesh Prasad's brilliant bowling that dismissed Shoaib Akhtar for a duck. India advanced to the semi-finals.
However, the controversy did not fade. In the subcontinent, the dismissal was replayed endlessly on television and discussed in print media for weeks. It became one of the defining examples of how a single incorrect umpiring decision could change history — even when the match result ultimately went India's way.
Decision stood in the pre-DRS era. India won the match but the decision remains disputed.
The 1999 World Cup Tendulkar dismissal is consistently referenced in discussions about the need for the Decision Review System. India was historically one of the most resistant nations to DRS adoption, but this incident — and others like it — eventually contributed to Indian fans and administrators accepting the need for technology-assisted officiating.
The match is remembered as much for Tendulkar's unjust dismissal as for the extraordinary geopolitical context. It remains one of the most cited examples of pre-DRS umpiring controversy, often used to illustrate what cricket lost — and gained — when technology was introduced.
Australia vs New Zealand
1 February 1981
Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the last ball underarm along the ground to prevent New Zealand from hitting a six to tie the match.
Australia vs India
7 February 1981
Sunil Gavaskar was given out LBW to Dennis Lillee off a ball that clearly hit his bat first. He was so furious he tried to take his batting partner Chetan Chauhan off the field with him.
Australia vs India
2-6 January 2008
One of the most controversial Tests ever — terrible umpiring decisions, racial abuse allegations, and India threatening to abandon the tour.