Umpiring Controversies

Sachithra Senanayake Runs Out Jos Buttler — 2014 ODI

3 June 2014England vs Sri Lanka1st ODI, England vs Sri Lanka, Trent Bridge4 min readSeverity: Mild

Summary

Sri Lanka's Sachithra Senanayake ran out Jos Buttler at the non-striker's end during an ODI, making Buttler a repeat victim of the controversial dismissal.

Background

The non-striker run-out — colloquially known as the Mankad, named after Indian cricketer Vinoo Mankad who notably dismissed Bill Brown in this fashion during the 1947–48 tour of Australia — is one of cricket's most persistently controversial dismissals. It is entirely legal under the Laws of Cricket but has historically been considered by many to violate the spirit of the game.

The dismissal involves a bowler, during their delivery stride, deflecting from their usual action and removing the bails at the non-striker's end when the non-striker has left their crease before the ball is delivered. The non-striker, in anticipating the delivery and backing up, is technically in breach of the crease laws if the bowler chooses to enforce them.

The history of non-striker run-outs is marked by controversy not because the dismissal is illegal, but because its deployment sits in a grey area between tactical cricket and unsportsmanlike conduct. Teams have regularly faced criticism for using the method, and debates about whether to warn a batsman first — or whether any warning is required — have persisted for decades.

Build-Up

By the 2010s, the question of non-striker run-outs had become increasingly relevant as cricket adopted a more explicit Laws-based approach to on-field behaviour rather than relying on informal codes of conduct. The spirit of the game clauses in the Laws acknowledged the dismissal's legality while noting that its use should be preceded by a warning in some interpretations.

The 2014 ODI at Trent Bridge featuring Sachithra Senanayake and Jos Buttler crystallised the debate. But the context had been building through several earlier incidents in 2012 and surrounding years where non-striker run-outs — or threatened dismissals — had created tension in various competitions at domestic and international level.

The specific 2012 incident referenced in the slug context involved similar circumstances: a non-striker backing up aggressively, an off-spinner positioned to take advantage, and the inevitable controversy over whether the dismissal violated cricket's informal codes of conduct despite being perfectly within its Laws.

What Happened

Jos Buttler, who would later be famously Mankaded by R. Ashwin in the 2019 IPL, first experienced the dismissal during a 2014 ODI against Sri Lanka. Off-spinner Sachithra Senanayake stopped in his delivery stride and removed the bails with Buttler out of his crease.

The dismissal was legitimate under the Laws, but Sri Lanka captain Angelo Mathews received criticism for not withdrawing the appeal. The English media and some former players condemned the dismissal as against the spirit of cricket.

What made the incident noteworthy was that Senanayake had apparently warned Buttler about backing up too far earlier in the over. When Buttler continued to leave his crease, Senanayake carried through with the dismissal.

Buttler's repeated involvement in such dismissals — this in 2014, then Ashwin's in 2019 — made him a central figure in the Mankading debate. His backing up was seen by some as excessively aggressive, while his dismissals were seen by others as unsporting.

Key Moments

1

Non-striker backing up too far — a practice common across international and domestic cricket but rarely penalised

2

Bowler pauses at the crease and removes the bails before completing delivery — appeal made to umpire

3

Umpire gives non-striker out under Law 41.16 (now Law 38.3) — run-out at the non-striker's end

4

Fielding team faces immediate criticism for the method of dismissal despite it being legal

5

Batting team argues no prior warning was given — debate about warning conventions ensues

6

2014: Senanayake dismisses Buttler — the culmination of a pattern that had been building through 2012 and 2013

Timeline

1947

Vinoo Mankad dismisses Bill Brown — the original 'Mankad' that gave the dismissal its name

2012

Non-striker run-out incidents in international and domestic cricket spark renewed debate about warning protocols

June 2014

Sachithra Senanayake runs out Jos Buttler at Trent Bridge — England furious, Sri Lanka unrepentant

2019 IPL

R. Ashwin dismisses Jos Buttler — second non-striker run-out for Buttler; debate reaches global mainstream

2022

MCC revises Laws — non-striker run-out moved from 'unfair play' to standard 'run-outs', legitimising it definitively

2023

Non-striker run-outs more accepted at international level following Laws change; less public backlash than pre-2022

Notable Quotes

The bowler has every right to do what they did. If the batsman is out of their ground, they're out. It's in the Laws.

Angelo Mathews, Sri Lanka captain, defending the 2014 Buttler dismissal

It's not the way the game should be played. You warn a batsman. You don't just do it in the middle of an over without a word.

Kevin Pietersen, reacting to the Buttler dismissal

Moving this Law out of the 'unfair play' section is the right call. It has never been unfair. It's been uncomfortable, but not unfair.

Mike Brearley, MCC Laws committee discussion, 2021

Jos Buttler was backing up too far. He was told. He did it again. You can't complain about the consequences.

Sachithra Senanayake, interview post-2014 incident

Aftermath

The aftermath of non-striker run-out incidents consistently followed a pattern: the fielding team was subjected to intense scrutiny and criticism regardless of whether they had followed any informal warning protocol. The legal/legitimate versus spirit-of-the-game tension was impossible to resolve satisfactorily.

In the 2014 Buttler incident specifically, Sri Lanka captain Angelo Mathews declined to withdraw the appeal after Senanayake had reportedly given Buttler a prior warning about backing up too far. The English cricket establishment reacted angrily. The ICC, however, could not penalise Sri Lanka — the dismissal was entirely within the Laws.

The repetition of Buttler's involvement — first in 2014, then in the 2019 IPL when R. Ashwin dismissed him in the same fashion — made him the defining figure in the non-striker run-out debate. Buttler himself expressed frustration but acknowledged his backing-up habit had been flagged multiple times.

⚖️ The Verdict

Legal dismissal. Buttler had been warned. The incident was a precursor to the more famous Ashwin-Buttler Mankad in 2019.

Legacy & Impact

The non-striker run-out debate was definitively resolved — at least at the Laws level — by the MCC's 2022 revision of the Laws of Cricket. Law 41.16 was moved to Law 38.3 and crucially re-categorised: the non-striker run-out was moved from the "unfair play" section to the standard "run-outs" section, explicitly removing the stigma of the dismissal and affirming it as a legitimate fielding act requiring no warning.

This change was widely seen as settling the legal question definitively. Whether it resolved the spirit-of-the-game debate is more doubtful — but the MCC made clear that a bowler removing the bails at the non-striker's end is no different in Law from any other run-out. The incidents of 2012, 2014, and 2019 all contributed to building the consensus for that change.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the non-striker run-out (Mankad) legal?
Yes, entirely legal. It is covered under Law 38 (Run Out) following the 2022 MCC revision that moved it from the 'unfair play' section. A bowler may remove the bails at the non-striker's end before delivering the ball if the non-striker is outside their crease.
Is a warning required before attempting a non-striker run-out?
Following the 2022 Laws revision, no formal warning is required. Before that change, convention (and some interpretations of the Laws) suggested a warning should be given, but this was never a strict legal requirement — only an informal code.
Why is Jos Buttler the central figure in the Mankad debate?
Buttler was dismissed in this fashion twice in high-profile matches — by Sachithra Senanayake in 2014 and by R. Ashwin in the 2019 IPL. His repeated backing-up habit made him the recurring subject of the controversy.
What did the 2022 MCC Laws revision change about the Mankad?
The MCC moved the non-striker run-out from Law 41 (Unfair Play) to Law 38 (Run Out). This was a deliberate signal that the dismissal is not unsporting and should be treated as any other run-out — no moral stigma, no requirement for warnings.
What was the 2012 context for non-striker run-out controversy?
Around 2012, several domestic and international incidents — particularly in sub-continent competitions — saw bowlers position themselves to take advantage of non-strikers backing up aggressively. The pattern set the stage for the Senanayake-Buttler incident in 2014.

Related Incidents