Indian batsman Rahul Dravid was caught on camera applying what appeared to be a lozenge or cough sweet to the ball during the Adelaide Test against Australia.
During the second Test between Australia and India at Adelaide in January 2004, television cameras captured Rahul Dravid apparently applying a substance to the ball. The footage showed Dravid putting something from a wrapper into his mouth, generating saliva, and then rubbing the ball.
Match referee Clive Lloyd investigated the incident and found that Dravid had applied an energy lozenge (cough sweet) to the ball, which could alter its condition through the sugary saliva. Dravid was found guilty of ball tampering and fined 50% of his match fee. He received a one-match suspended ban.
The incident was awkward because Dravid was universally regarded as one of cricket's great gentlemen - "The Wall" - and a player known for his integrity. India's team management was furious at the charge, arguing that Dravid had not deliberately tried to tamper with the ball. However, the rules were clear that applying any artificial substance to the ball constituted tampering.
The incident had minimal long-term impact on Dravid's reputation, as his otherwise impeccable record spoke for itself. However, it highlighted that ball tampering rules were strict and that even unintentional application of substances to the ball could lead to charges. The case also led to clearer guidelines about what players could and could not do while handling the ball.
Found guilty of ball tampering. Fined 50% of match fee and received a one-match suspended ban.
Cricket Canada
12 May 2026
ICC suspended six months of funding to Cricket Canada over governance failures and financial misreporting — 63% of their total revenue.
Multiple franchises
8 May 2026
The IPL's Anti-Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU) submitted a formal report to the BCCI in May 2026 flagging "certain anomalies" observed across the league stage: unauthorised persons had been seen in the team dugout, on the team bus, and at team hotels during IPL matches in apparent breach of anti-corruption Standard Operating Procedures. IPL chairman Arun Dhumal confirmed the report publicly and warned that "very stringent action" would be taken if violations continued. Separately, the BCCI tightened protocols after reports that certain franchise owners had been seen mingling with players in restricted areas — a specific interaction prohibited under the anti-corruption framework.
Various county sides
1865-08-01
Despite MCC's attempts to reduce gambling on cricket through the 1840s and 1850s, county cricket in the 1860s still operated in a culture where betting was widespread and where allegations of arranged results circulated freely among those closest to the game. Several county fixtures of the decade generated suspicion among contemporaries that the outcome had been agreed in advance, though the absence of formal investigation meant that no players were ever charged.