Inzamam-ul-Haq was given out 'handled the ball' in a Test match after instinctively swatting the ball away from his stumps, one of cricket's rarest dismissals.
During the third Test between England and Pakistan in 2006, Inzamam-ul-Haq was dismissed in one of cricket's most unusual ways — "handled the ball." After playing a defensive shot, the ball rolled back towards his stumps.
Instinctively, Inzamam reached down and knocked the ball away from the stumps with his hand. The English players appealed, and the umpire had no choice but to give him out under Law 33 (now part of Law 37 — obstructing the field).
Inzamam was clearly acting on instinct rather than trying to gain an unfair advantage, but the Laws were clear. It was one of only a handful of "handled the ball" dismissals in Test history.
The incident highlighted one of cricket's more obscure laws and the difficulty umpires face when a dismissal is technically correct but feels harsh. The "handled the ball" mode of dismissal was later merged into "obstructing the field" in the 2017 revision of the Laws.
Correctly given out under the Laws, though widely seen as harsh. The mode of dismissal was later merged into 'obstructing the field.'
Gujarat Titans vs Rajasthan Royals
29 May 2026
The Qualifier 2 toss between Gujarat Titans and Rajasthan Royals at Mullanpur had to be conducted twice after match referee Prakash Bhatt failed to hear Riyan Parag's call — a visible frustration for Shubman Gill who appeared to have won the original toss before the do-over.
Lucknow Super Giants vs Kolkata Knight Riders
26 April 2026
Kartik Tyagi bowled two beamers in the final over of LSG's chase but was allowed to continue — umpires called only one dangerous — sparking IPL fury.
Various county and representative sides
1864-06-01
The legalisation of overarm bowling in 1864 created an immediate grey zone: how high could the arm go, and at what point did a fast delivery become an illegal throw? Through the 1860s English cricket struggled with this question as a succession of fast bowlers developed actions that umpires suspected but rarely no-balled, creating a climate of suspicion that would recur in every generation of cricket thereafter.