An appeal for obstructing the field was considered during the Lord's Test between England and South Africa, highlighting one of cricket's most rarely invoked Laws.
During the third Test between England and South Africa at Lord's, an incident occurred where a batsman appeared to deliberately change direction to obstruct a fielder from effecting a run-out. The on-field umpires had to consider an appeal for "obstructing the field."
Obstructing the field is one of cricket's rarest modes of dismissal, and umpires are often unfamiliar with the nuances of the law when it arises in real time. The law requires that the obstruction be deliberate — a batsman who accidentally collides with a fielder should not be given out.
The incident required the umpires to make a subjective judgment about intent, which is always difficult. Was the batsman deliberately trying to prevent the run-out, or was the collision accidental as both parties tried to occupy the same space?
The appeal was ultimately not upheld, with the umpires judging the obstruction to be accidental. But the incident served as a reminder of how cricket's more obscure laws can suddenly become relevant and how difficult they are to adjudicate in the heat of a Test match.
Not given out. The umpires judged the contact to be accidental. The incident highlighted the difficulty of adjudicating intent in real time.
Gujarat Titans vs Rajasthan Royals
29 May 2026
The Qualifier 2 toss between Gujarat Titans and Rajasthan Royals at Mullanpur had to be conducted twice after match referee Prakash Bhatt failed to hear Riyan Parag's call — a visible frustration for Shubman Gill who appeared to have won the original toss before the do-over.
Lucknow Super Giants vs Kolkata Knight Riders
26 April 2026
Kartik Tyagi bowled two beamers in the final over of LSG's chase but was allowed to continue — umpires called only one dangerous — sparking IPL fury.
Various county and representative sides
1864-06-01
The legalisation of overarm bowling in 1864 created an immediate grey zone: how high could the arm go, and at what point did a fast delivery become an illegal throw? Through the 1860s English cricket struggled with this question as a succession of fast bowlers developed actions that umpires suspected but rarely no-balled, creating a climate of suspicion that would recur in every generation of cricket thereafter.