Several contentious LBW decisions went both ways during India's historic follow-on victory against Australia in Kolkata 2001, one of the greatest Tests ever played.
The 2001 Kolkata Test is one of cricket's greatest matches — India became only the third team in history to win after following on. VVS Laxman's 281 and Rahul Dravid's 180 are etched in legend. But like most great Tests, umpiring decisions played a role.
During India's second innings, several LBW decisions favoured the home side. Conversely, Australian batsmen felt they were on the wrong end of close calls during their chase of 384. The pressure on umpires in such a dramatic match was immense.
One key moment came when Laxman was given not out to an LBW appeal early in his epic innings. Had the decision gone the other way, the entire trajectory of the match — and arguably the series — would have been different.
In the pre-DRS era, such decisions were accepted as part of the game. But the Kolkata Test remains a perfect example of how umpiring calls in close matches shape cricket history in ways that technology might later question.
Multiple close decisions throughout the match. India's historic victory stood. No DRS to review any decisions.
Gujarat Titans vs Rajasthan Royals
29 May 2026
The Qualifier 2 toss between Gujarat Titans and Rajasthan Royals at Mullanpur had to be conducted twice after match referee Prakash Bhatt failed to hear Riyan Parag's call — a visible frustration for Shubman Gill who appeared to have won the original toss before the do-over.
Lucknow Super Giants vs Kolkata Knight Riders
26 April 2026
Kartik Tyagi bowled two beamers in the final over of LSG's chase but was allowed to continue — umpires called only one dangerous — sparking IPL fury.
Various county and representative sides
1864-06-01
The legalisation of overarm bowling in 1864 created an immediate grey zone: how high could the arm go, and at what point did a fast delivery become an illegal throw? Through the 1860s English cricket struggled with this question as a succession of fast bowlers developed actions that umpires suspected but rarely no-balled, creating a climate of suspicion that would recur in every generation of cricket thereafter.