Multiple teams were penalized five runs for fake fielding during IPL 2023, with inconsistent enforcement sparking confusion and debate.
The 2023 IPL saw the aggressive enforcement of the fake fielding rule (Law 41.5), which penalizes fielders who deliberately deceive batsmen by pretending to field the ball when they don't have it. Five penalty runs are awarded to the batting side.
Several teams fell foul of the rule. The most notable incident involved fielders making throwing motions towards the stumps when the ball was with another fielder, causing batsmen to hesitate in running between wickets. In some cases, the deception was blatant; in others, it was borderline.
The inconsistency in enforcement was the main issue. Similar actions in some matches went unpunished while in others they drew penalties. Captains and coaches expressed confusion about where the line was drawn. Some argued that fielders naturally make gestures and that the rule was being over-applied.
The controversy highlighted the challenge of legislating for sportsmanship. While the rule's intent — preventing deliberate deception — was sound, its application required subjective judgment from umpires, leading to inevitable inconsistency.
Penalties were correctly applied under the Laws, but inconsistent enforcement remains an issue. The ICC has continued to refine guidelines.
Gujarat Titans vs Rajasthan Royals
29 May 2026
The Qualifier 2 toss between Gujarat Titans and Rajasthan Royals at Mullanpur had to be conducted twice after match referee Prakash Bhatt failed to hear Riyan Parag's call — a visible frustration for Shubman Gill who appeared to have won the original toss before the do-over.
Lucknow Super Giants vs Kolkata Knight Riders
26 April 2026
Kartik Tyagi bowled two beamers in the final over of LSG's chase but was allowed to continue — umpires called only one dangerous — sparking IPL fury.
Various county and representative sides
1864-06-01
The legalisation of overarm bowling in 1864 created an immediate grey zone: how high could the arm go, and at what point did a fast delivery become an illegal throw? Through the 1860s English cricket struggled with this question as a succession of fast bowlers developed actions that umpires suspected but rarely no-balled, creating a climate of suspicion that would recur in every generation of cricket thereafter.