The Underarm Bowling Incident
Australia vs New Zealand
1 February 1981
Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the last ball underarm along the ground to prevent New Zealand from hitting a six to tie the match.
Play was stopped for bad light despite the availability of floodlights, frustrating fans and players as Pakistan pushed for a result.
The Covid-19 pandemic reshaped international cricket in 2020. England hosted the West Indies and Pakistan in bio-secure bubbles at Old Trafford and the Ageas Bowl — matches played in empty stadiums but broadcast to millions of cricket-starved fans. The Pakistan series was Pakistan's first tour to England since 2016 and carried enormous anticipation.
Old Trafford has historically been one of England's most weather-affected grounds, sitting in the rain-shadow of the Pennines. Manchester's climate has cost England Test victories across the decades. The 2020 series was played in August, typically the most settled period of the English summer, but the ground's reputation preceded it.
The bad light playing regulation had been a source of frustration for decades. Unlike rain — a force majeure — bad light stoppages involve umpire discretion, and that discretion has always been exercised inconsistently. The fundamental question is unresolved: how much light is too little for a batsman to safely face fast bowling? The answer changes depending on who is bowling, who is batting, and how the match is poised.
The first Test was finely balanced heading into the final day. Pakistan had bowled England out and were chasing 277 in 75 overs — a challenging but achievable target on a flat Old Trafford pitch. The match had the potential to be a classic fifth-day finish.
The umpires had already made several light offers during the fourth day when cloud cover thickened across Manchester. On both occasions Pakistan, who were in the field, had chosen to play on — a decision that kept the match moving. England, knowing a result was possible, were desperate for overs.
On the final day, the dynamics reversed. Pakistan were batting, chasing a target, and when the light deteriorated the umpires offered the option of going off. Pakistan, at 100-odd for a few wickets with the match in the balance, accepted. The irony was pointed: the same bad light that had been manageable while Pakistan were bowling now suddenly became unacceptable when their wickets were in danger.
During the first Test between England and Pakistan at Old Trafford in 2020, play was halted due to bad light despite the ground having floodlights. The decision frustrated both teams and viewers, as the match was finely poised and Pakistan were pushing for victory.
The bad light rule has been one of cricket's most persistent frustrations. Despite the availability of floodlights at virtually all international venues, umpires retain the power to stop play when they deem the light insufficient for the safety of batsmen, particularly against fast bowling.
Critics have long argued that the rule is anachronistic. If cricket can be played under lights in day-night Tests and in T20s under floodlights, why can't play continue in a regular Test when conditions are similar? The inconsistency has cost cricket thousands of hours of lost play over the decades.
The ICC has tweaked the bad light rules multiple times but has never fully resolved the issue. The fundamental tension between player safety and the entertainment value of the sport remains, with umpires caught in the middle.
Day 5, Old Trafford: Pakistan chasing 277 in 75 overs; match finely poised as a potential Pakistan win or England win
Umpires offer bad light to Pakistan on multiple occasions during the final day when Pakistan are batting
Pakistan accept the light offer, halting play for extended periods with the match in the balance
England's frustration mounts as available overs for a result are consumed by the stoppages
Floodlights are available at Old Trafford but cannot be used in Tests under ICC regulations at the time
Match ends in a draw; England express frustration at the inconsistency in how light offers were extended
5 August 2020
1st Test begins at Old Trafford in bio-secure bubble; no spectators due to Covid-19 protocols
Days 1-4
Match evenly contested; Pakistan bowl England out and set up a genuine Day 5 finish
Day 5, morning session
Pakistan chase 277 in 75 overs; cloud cover thickens over Old Trafford
Day 5, afternoon
Umpires offer bad light to Pakistan multiple times; Pakistan accept, halting play
Day 5, close
Match ends in a draw; England publicly criticise inconsistency of bad light decisions
2020–2021
ICC reviews bad light playing conditions; incremental tightening of criteria but no abolition
“We have floodlights at this ground. We have played day-night cricket under lights. The inconsistency is impossible to explain.”
“The umpires offered the light — we were entitled to accept it. That is what the regulations allow. We followed the rules.”
“The bad light rule is an anachronism. It belongs to an era before floodlights existed at international grounds.”
The match ended in a draw that both sides could have won. England were publicly frustrated: their captain Joe Root questioned whether the bad light decisions had been applied consistently and whether the umpires had been too quick to offer the option to Pakistan when they were in trouble. Pakistan's management felt they had simply followed the rules as they were entitled to.
The ICC reviewed the bad light playing conditions following the match and the broader series. The fundamental tension was acknowledged: floodlights are standard at virtually every international ground, T20 and day-night Tests are played under artificial light routinely, yet the bad light regulation still allows batsmen to decline to play in Test conditions that would be acceptable in other formats.
The incident added to a growing body of cases used by reformers to argue for the abolition of bad light as a reason for stopping play — replacing it with a simpler rain rule that halts play only when natural precipitation, not natural light levels, makes play impossible or unsafe.
Match drawn. Bad light rules continue to frustrate. The ICC has made incremental changes but no comprehensive solution.
The 2020 Old Trafford match did not produce the rule change its critics demanded, but it became a frequently cited example in the ongoing debate about cricket's playing conditions. The ICC has incrementally narrowed the circumstances in which umpires can offer bad light — the rule now requires more extreme conditions than it previously did — but has stopped short of abolishing it entirely.
The broader legacy is about the tension between umpire discretion and consistent application of rules. In an era where DRS has removed much of that discretion from decision-making on lbw and catches, the bad light rule stands as one of the last areas where on-field officials exercise broad subjective judgment in real time. Whether that judgment can ever be exercised consistently enough to satisfy all parties remains open.
Australia vs New Zealand
1 February 1981
Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the last ball underarm along the ground to prevent New Zealand from hitting a six to tie the match.
Australia vs India
7 February 1981
Sunil Gavaskar was given out LBW to Dennis Lillee off a ball that clearly hit his bat first. He was so furious he tried to take his batting partner Chetan Chauhan off the field with him.
Australia vs India
2-6 January 2008
One of the most controversial Tests ever — terrible umpiring decisions, racial abuse allegations, and India threatening to abandon the tour.