Umpiring Controversies

Deepti Sharma Runs Out Charlie Dean at Non-Striker's End

24 September 2022India Women vs England Women3rd ODI, India Women vs England Women4 min readSeverity: Moderate

Summary

Deepti Sharma ran out Charlie Dean at the non-striker's end to seal an ODI series sweep. The dismissal reignited the Mankad debate globally.

Background

The 2022 ICC Women's Championship series between England Women and India Women was the context for one of cricket's most debated moments. By the time the teams met for the final ODI at Lord's on 24 September 2022, India had already won the series 2-0, but cricket history was about to be made.

Just months earlier, in October 2022, the ICC had formally moved the non-striker run-out from the 'unfair play' section (Law 41) to the standard 'run out' section (Law 38) of the Laws of Cricket. The intent was clear: ICC wanted to normalise the dismissal and end the decades-long debate about whether it was within the spirit of the game. But the debate about that spirit was not so easily resolved by a legislative change.

India Women had been playing outstanding cricket throughout the series. Deepti Sharma, India's all-rounder, was in fine form with bat and ball. What she would do at Lord's, however, would eclipse everything else from the series in the public consciousness.

Build-Up

England required 169 to win the final ODI and level a consolation victory. They were bowled out for 153 in a chase that went to the last wicket. At 153/9, England's Charlotte Dean — a tail-ender batting above herself — was putting together a remarkable partnership with Kate Cross, England's No. 11.

With 17 runs needed off 17 balls, England had an outside chance. The tension at Lord's was palpable. Charlotte Dean had already scored 47, contributing far more than her position in the order would suggest. Every delivery was a potential match-winner or match-ender.

Deepti Sharma, bowling from the Nursery End, noticed Dean backing up too far before the ball was released. In full view of the Lord's crowd, and with the match on the line, Deepti removed the bails at the non-striker's end before delivering the ball. Third umpire gave Dean out — run out. India won by 16 runs and completed a 3-0 series sweep.

What Happened

In the third ODI at Lord's, England's Charlie Dean was batting brilliantly with a counter-attacking 47, threatening to pull off an unlikely England victory. With England at 153/9, Deepti Sharma noticed Dean backing up too far and removed the bails at the non-striker's end.

The dismissal gave India a 3-0 series sweep, but the manner of the final wicket overshadowed the result. MCC, the custodians of the Laws, immediately stated the dismissal was "legitimate." Crucially, this incident came after the ICC had already moved the law from "unfair play" to the "run out" section, normalizing it.

Dean was visibly upset and in tears. Some England players and commentators criticized the dismissal, though many Indian and neutral voices supported Deepti's right to enforce the law. Former England captain Nasser Hussain said the batsman was "cheating" by leaving the crease early.

The incident was significant because it was one of the first major instances after the 2022 rule change and helped shift public opinion towards accepting the dismissal as legitimate.

Key Moments

1

England reach 153/9, chasing 169; Charlotte Dean has scored an extraordinary 47 batting at No. 10

2

England need 17 off 17 balls with Kate Cross as last batter; England have an outside chance of winning

3

Deepti Sharma notices Dean backing up significantly before the ball is released at the non-striker's end

4

Without warning, Deepti removes the bails at the non-striker's end before releasing the ball; third umpire gives Dean out

5

Charlotte Dean is visibly upset and in tears in the dressing room; England players are angry

6

India celebrate a 3-0 series sweep at Lord's; MCC immediately issues a statement calling the dismissal legitimate

Timeline

24 Sep 2022

5th ODI at Lord's; India Women vs England Women; India need a win to complete a 3-0 series sweep

England innings

England collapse to 153/9 chasing 169; Charlotte Dean contributes 47 batting at No. 10 in a last-wicket partnership with Kate Cross

Final overs

England need 17 off 17 balls; Deepti Sharma is bowling from the Nursery End

The dismissal

Deepti removes the bails at the non-striker's end before releasing the ball; Dean is well out of her crease; third umpire gives her out

Immediate reaction

Dean in tears; England players angry; MCC issues a statement within hours calling the dismissal legitimate; Nasser Hussain defends Deepti

Oct 2022

ICC's earlier 2022 law change (moving the dismissal from 'unfair play' to 'run out') is widely discussed in the aftermath; debate about spirit of cricket intensifies globally

Notable Quotes

It's in the rules. If you don't want to get out that way, stay in your crease.

Deepti Sharma, post-match

Charlotte Dean was cheating by backing up too far. I have no sympathy — stay in your crease.

Nasser Hussain, former England captain and commentator

This is not cricket. You don't do this at Lord's. You don't do this anywhere.

Stuart Broad, England fast bowler

The MCC changed the law. The ICC changed the law. If you are still backing up too far, you deserve to be run out.

Anjum Chopra, former India Women's captain

Aftermath

The reaction was immediate and fierce. English pundits, former players, and fans were outraged. Some called it a betrayal of the spirit of cricket. Charlotte Dean's visible distress attracted wide sympathy. The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) officially accepted the dismissal but several English voices — including former captains and commentators — condemned the method.

MCC issued a statement within hours: "MCC's message to all cricketers is to be aware of this method of dismissal." Crucially, they did not condemn India — they placed the responsibility on batters to stay in their crease. Nasser Hussain, in a notable intervention, sided with India, saying Dean was "cheating" by leaving her crease early.

⚖️ The Verdict

Completely legal under the updated 2022 playing conditions. Helped normalize the non-striker run-out in cricket culture.

Legacy & Impact

The Deepti Sharma dismissal at Lord's became the 2022 flashpoint that defined the non-striker run-out debate for a new generation. By occurring at Lord's — the 'home of cricket' — and involving a team from England who had long championed the spirit of the game, it forced a genuine reckoning.

The incident is now cited as the moment that finally shifted mainstream opinion towards accepting the non-striker run-out as legitimate. The combination of the recent law change, the high-profile venue, and the powerful backing from voices like Nasser Hussain meant that the 'spirit of cricket' argument against the dismissal was severely weakened. Deepti Sharma became a polarising but significant figure in cricket's legal history.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was the Deepti Sharma dismissal legal?
Yes. The dismissal was completely legal under both the Laws of Cricket and the ICC's playing conditions. The ICC had moved the non-striker run-out from the 'unfair play' section to the standard 'run out' section earlier in 2022.
Did Deepti Sharma warn Charlotte Dean before the dismissal?
No. Unlike the original Vinoo Mankad dismissal in 1947, Deepti did not issue a warning. The Laws of Cricket do not require a warning — the batter is responsible for staying in their crease until the ball is delivered.
What was MCC's response?
MCC issued a statement saying the dismissal was legitimate and urging all cricketers to be aware of the method. They placed responsibility on non-strikers to remain in their crease, not on bowlers to refrain from using the Law.
Why was the reaction in England so negative?
England has historically championed the 'spirit of cricket' and the idea that cricket should be played in a certain way beyond mere legality. Many English pundits felt the dismissal violated those unwritten norms, even if it was technically legal.
Did the incident change how people view the non-striker run-out?
Significantly, yes. The combination of the recent law change, high-profile venue, and support from respected voices like Nasser Hussain shifted mainstream opinion. The dismissal is now widely accepted as a legitimate part of cricket strategy.

Related Incidents