The Underarm Bowling Incident
Australia vs New Zealand
1 February 1981
Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the last ball underarm along the ground to prevent New Zealand from hitting a six to tie the match.
England survived the final session with last pair James Anderson and Monty Panesar at the crease. Australia were convinced they had Anderson LBW but the appeal was turned down.
The 2009 Ashes was England's first home series against Australia since the dramatic 2005 triumph. England were keen to prove that series was not a fluke; Australia were equally determined to reclaim the urn. Cardiff hosted the first Test — a ground that had only recently received Test status and was staging the biggest match in its history.
England had adopted DRS in principle but, controversially, the ICC allowed individual boards to opt in or out of the review system. Australia declined to adopt DRS for the 2009 Ashes, meaning both teams played without the safety net of technology referrals. This decision would have enormous consequences.
James Anderson and Monty Panesar were England's last pair — two specialist bowlers with minimal batting credentials. For them to save a Test against the world's best bowling attack would require a combination of technical resistance, luck, and extraordinary composure.
England had followed on and were in deep trouble on the final day. The combination of Hilfenhaus, Johnson, Siddle, and Hauritz had reduced England to 46 overs to bat out, with regular wickets falling. When Paul Collingwood edged to slip, Anderson came to the crease with 11.3 overs still to be bowled.
Australia were sensing victory that would put them 1-0 up with momentum in a five-match series. Their fielders gathered tightly, sensing one more wicket would end it. Ponting pushed the field up aggressively, clearly believing that a single good delivery would be enough.
Anderson and Panesar, however, played with remarkable concentration. They blocked, they evaded the short ball, and they survived. Each over that passed increased England's probability of survival, but the tension never dissipated — every ball felt potentially decisive.
The first Test of the 2009 Ashes at Cardiff produced an extraordinary final day. England, following on, were in deep trouble and their last pair of James Anderson and Monty Panesar had to survive 11.3 overs to save the match.
During the nerve-wracking final session, Australia appealed vociferously for LBW against Anderson off a Hilfenhaus delivery. Umpire Rudi Koertzen turned it down. Replays suggested the ball was hitting the stumps, and Hawkeye showed it would have clipped off stump.
Had DRS been in use (it was available but not adopted for this series), Australia could have reviewed and likely obtained the wicket. Instead, Anderson and Panesar survived 69 balls together, and England drew the match.
The denied LBW shaped the entire series. England went on to win the Ashes 2-1. Had the decision been given, Australia would have won the first Test, and the series dynamics would have been completely different. It remains one of the great "what if" moments in Ashes cricket.
England follow on; last pair Anderson and Panesar need to survive 11.3 overs to draw
Hilfenhaus delivers a full ball that hits Anderson on the pad; vociferous lbw appeal
Umpire Rudi Koertzen turns it down; replays show ball tracking hitting middle and off stump
Australia unable to review — no DRS in use for this series by mutual agreement
Anderson and Panesar survive 69 balls together — one of the great rearguard actions
England draw the Test; go on to win the 2009 Ashes 2-1
Day 5, morning
England follow on; deep in trouble losing wickets steadily
Day 5, over 98
Anderson joins Panesar — last pair, 11.3 overs to survive
Day 5, over 103
Hilfenhaus LBW appeal against Anderson turned down by Koertzen
Day 5, over 108
Final over begins — Anderson and Panesar survive 69 balls in total
Day 5, 6:30 pm
Match drawn; England escape with point from Cardiff
2010 onwards
DRS becomes standard in Test cricket; Cardiff decision cited as key motivator
“We could see on the big screen that it was going to hit the stumps. That was incredibly frustrating.”
“I just kept telling Monty — head down, watch the ball, one delivery at a time.”
“The umpire could not have been certain in real time. That's why DRS exists — to correct exactly these situations.”
“Australia chose not to use DRS. That decision came back to hurt them very badly at Cardiff.”
The Australian dressing room was furious about the LBW non-decision against Anderson. Replays and ball-tracking technology — shown on television even though unavailable for match decisions — indicated the ball would have hit the stumps. Several Australian players spoke openly after the match about their frustration at the absence of DRS.
Ricky Ponting became one of the most vocal advocates for DRS adoption following the Cardiff Test, arguing that the technology existed and should be used. He cited the Anderson decision specifically as an example of how the absence of reviews could change the course of an entire series.
England's subsequent 2-1 series win meant that the Cardiff draw was retrospectively viewed as the fulcrum of the entire contest. Australia won at Headingley but lost at Lord's, Edgbaston, and The Oval — a pattern that might have been entirely different if they had won the first Test.
Not out decision stood. No DRS available for review. England escaped and went on to win the Ashes 2-1.
The Cardiff draw of 2009 stands as one of the most compelling arguments ever made for the widespread adoption of DRS. The combination of a potentially decisive incorrect decision, television coverage clearly showing the error, and no mechanism to correct it crystallised the debate in a way that statistical arguments about accuracy rates never could.
Australia's subsequent push for mandatory DRS adoption across all series gained significant traction after 2009. The ICC moved toward making DRS standard in Test cricket, and by 2012 it was adopted for all bilateral Test series. Anderson and Panesar's survival at Cardiff was, paradoxically, a catalyst for technology that would have given them out.
Australia vs New Zealand
1 February 1981
Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the last ball underarm along the ground to prevent New Zealand from hitting a six to tie the match.
Australia vs India
7 February 1981
Sunil Gavaskar was given out LBW to Dennis Lillee off a ball that clearly hit his bat first. He was so furious he tried to take his batting partner Chetan Chauhan off the field with him.
Australia vs India
2-6 January 2008
One of the most controversial Tests ever — terrible umpiring decisions, racial abuse allegations, and India threatening to abandon the tour.