Umpiring Controversies

Flintoff Survives LBW — Edgbaston 2005

4 August 2005England vs Australia2nd Ashes Test, Edgbaston, Birmingham5 min readSeverity: Serious

Summary

During his famous 68 in England's second innings at Edgbaston in 2005, Andrew Flintoff survived LBW appeals that replays suggested were out. England won by just 2 runs — the narrowest possible margin — making every reprieve Flintoff received potentially match-deciding.

Background

The 2005 Ashes is widely regarded as the greatest Test series in cricket history. England — for the first time since 1987 — had a team capable of beating Australia. Freddie Flintoff was the embodiment of English cricket's renaissance: tall, powerful, aggressive, and inspirational. He would end the series with 402 runs and 24 wickets.

The 2nd Test at Edgbaston was the series-defining match. England were desperate to win after being crushed at Lord's in the 1st Test. Australia, under Ricky Ponting, had won 11 consecutive Tests and showed no signs of the vulnerability that would eventually emerge. The Edgbaston Test has become so mythologised that every individual moment within it — every dropped catch, every run, every LBW appeal — carries extraordinary retrospective weight.

Andrew Flintoff's 68 in England's second innings was the cornerstone innings of a total that set Australia a target they nearly chased. At one point, Australia needed one wicket to win; at another, England needed one wicket to win. The match, ultimately decided by two runs, was the most dramatic Test of modern times.

Build-Up

England's second innings at Edgbaston was tense from the outset. Australia's bowlers — Warne, McGrath (who had left the field injured in the first innings), Lee, and Kasprowicz — were relentless. England needed to post a total that would challenge Australia while managing the relentless psychological pressure of a full-strength Australian attack.

Flintoff came in under pressure, with England needing runs and wickets falling around him. His batting was characterised by his natural aggression — hitting Shane Warne over mid-on for six was one of the most memorable moments of the innings — but also by a seriousness and purposefulness that reflected the occasion.

Several LBW appeals were made against Flintoff during his innings, particularly from Shane Warne's over-spinning deliveries and Brett Lee's pace. One appeal in particular — later reviewed extensively — appeared, from replays, to be hitting the stumps. The on-field umpire, Rudi Koertzen (in another high-profile appearance), gave it not out.

What Happened

During Flintoff's innings of 68 in England's second innings at Edgbaston, multiple LBW appeals were made against him. At least one — which replays later appeared to show was striking leg stump — was given not out by umpire Rudi Koertzen.

The appeal came from a ball that pitched on middle-and-leg and appeared to cut back into Flintoff. He played across the line and the ball struck his pad. Koertzen considered and shook his head. Warne and the Australian fielders exchanged disbelieving looks. On television, replays showed the ball appearing to track onto leg stump.

Without DRS — which was not available in 2005 — Australia could not challenge. They had to accept the decision and continue. Flintoff went on to score 68 before being dismissed, his innings part of England's total of 182 which set Australia a target of 282 to win.

Australia's chase was the most extraordinary in Ashes history. They reached 220/5 before the tail resistance began to crumble. Shane Warne contributed a vital 42. Brett Lee scored 43. At 279/9 — with 3 runs needed and 1 wicket remaining — Michael Kasprowicz and Lee needed to score 3 to win.

England took the final wicket with Steve Harmison. The margin of victory was 2 runs. Every single run and wicket in the match was consequently analysed and re-analysed. The LBW reprieve for Flintoff meant he had scored runs that contributed to England's total — in a match decided by 2 runs, the reprieve was potentially the difference between England winning and losing.

Key Moments

1

Flintoff comes in to bat with England under pressure in their second innings

2

Multiple LBW appeals made against Flintoff — at least one appears to track onto leg stump in replays

3

Umpire Koertzen gives it not out — Australia cannot challenge without DRS

4

Flintoff scores 68, including a famous six over mid-on off Shane Warne

5

Australia chase 282, reaching 279/9 before Harmison takes the final wicket

6

England win by 2 runs — the narrowest possible margin; Flintoff's reprieve potentially the difference

Timeline

England first innings

England post 407 — Trescothick 90, Flintoff 68 in first innings too

Australia first innings

Australia bowled out for 308 — England lead by 99

England second innings

Flintoff bats for 68 including surviving LBW appeals — England set 282

Australia chase

Australia reach 220/5 — match in the balance for hours

279/9

Australia 3 runs from winning with last wicket standing — Lee and Kasprowicz at crease

England win

Harmison takes Kasprowicz's wicket — England win by 2 runs; Flintoff consoles Lee

Notable Quotes

That was out. We all knew it was out. But that's cricket — you get these decisions and you can't do anything about them.

Shane Warne

Every single run mattered in that match. We won by two. Every decision that went our way was part of why we won.

Andrew Strauss

Freddie's innings was remarkable. The way he batted with the tail, the way he played Warne — he was immense.

Michael Vaughan, England captain

I gave everything in that match. Every player on both sides did. In a match like that, you live or die by your decisions.

Andrew Flintoff

Aftermath

The Edgbaston Test ended to scenes of absolute jubilation. Flintoff's gesture of consoling the devastated Brett Lee — crouching down to put his arm around the Australian bowler amid England's celebrations — became one of cricket's most iconic images, a symbol of sportsmanship in the most intense contest.

Australia's players and management privately acknowledged that certain decisions in the match had not gone their way. Ponting was philosophical in defeat but noted that the margins were so small that any individual moment could have swung the result. The LBW reprieve was part of that catalogue.

England went on to win the 2005 Ashes 2-1, ending Australia's 16-year Ashes dominance. Flintoff was named Player of the Series for his extraordinary all-round contributions. The 2005 Ashes generated an unprecedented cricket boom in England — hundreds of thousands of people who had never watched cricket before were drawn in by the drama.

⚖️ The Verdict

Apparent umpiring error in one of cricket's most dramatic matches. Flintoff's LBW reprieve contributed to England's total in a match won by 2 runs — making it potentially one of the most consequential missed decisions in Ashes history, though the two-run margin means every moment in the match can be claimed as decisive.

Legacy & Impact

The 2005 Ashes — and the Edgbaston Test in particular — is the gold standard for cricket drama. Every moment in the match has been analysed and celebrated thousands of times. The Flintoff LBW reprieve is a small part of a very large and extraordinary story.

Rudi Koertzen's presence in yet another high-profile incident is a notable footnote. The South African umpire officiated through an era when the game was transitioning from pure human judgment to technological assistance, and his involvement in multiple key decisions of the pre-DRS era is a significant part of cricket officiating history.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the 2005 Ashes regarded as the greatest Test series?
The 2005 Ashes contained four of the most dramatic Tests in history, including the Edgbaston match decided by 2 runs and the Old Trafford Test drawn in the final over. The quality of cricket, the individual performances, and the narrative arc — England ending Australia's long dominance — combined to make it uniquely memorable.
Was the LBW reprieve confirmed as incorrect?
Modern ball-tracking analysis of available footage suggests the ball may have been hitting leg stump, but the footage quality of 2005 and the absence of definitive ball-tracking technology mean this cannot be stated with absolute certainty. The evidence is suggestive rather than conclusive.
Was DRS available in the 2005 Ashes?
No. DRS was not available in 2005. The technology was introduced experimentally from 2008 onwards. The 2005 Ashes was decided entirely by human umpiring judgment and, in a series of this closeness, every marginal decision had potentially enormous consequences.
What happened to England after winning the 2005 Ashes?
England's Ashes victory sparked an enormous cricket boom in England. Flintoff was made an MBE. England subsequently toured Pakistan and Sri Lanka before losing the next Ashes series in Australia 5-0 in 2006-07 — the same group of players who had so brilliantly won in 2005 were dismantled by an Australian team that had quietly rebuilt.
How many wickets did Flintoff take in the 2005 Ashes?
Flintoff took 24 wickets in the 2005 Ashes at an average of 27.29 and scored 402 runs at 40.20 — one of the great all-round performances in any Ashes series. He was named Player of the Series.

Related Incidents