When the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in August 2021, one of their early domestic policy decisions was the banning of women from sports, including cricket. Afghanistan Cricket — at the time an emerging force in men's cricket — suddenly became a member of the ICC whose government explicitly prohibited half its population from playing the sport the ICC governed.
The ICC's membership regulations require member boards to ensure that cricket is available to all eligible individuals without discrimination based on gender, among other grounds. Afghanistan's government's position was an explicit, enforced violation of this requirement.
The ICC faced an impossible dilemma. Banning Afghanistan's men's team — which had no role in the Taliban's policy and whose players were largely unaffected by it — would punish the players for their government's actions. Continuing to allow Afghanistan to participate gave the ICC's implicit endorsement to a governance structure that was in breach of ICC membership requirements.
The ICC chose to continue allowing Afghanistan's men's team to participate in ICC events — including the 2021 T20 World Cup, the 2023 ODI World Cup, and the 2024 T20 World Cup — while formally noting the situation was "being monitored." Critics described this as a de facto capitulation to commercial considerations: Afghanistan men's cricket drew significant viewership and their matches against India in particular were commercially significant.
Multiple ICC member nations — including Australia — refused to play Afghanistan in bilateral series, taking unilateral action where the ICC declined to act collectively. The Afghanistan situation exposed the ICC's governance framework as inadequate for geopolitical challenges of this nature.
Women's cricket advocates argued the ICC was setting a precedent that gender discrimination in a member nation would be tolerated as long as the men's game continued to generate value.